Defame attempt

Some, having no other arguments, try to splash mud on us. This was the case with the websites demotywatory.pl and PortalKujawski.pl, which dishonestly and defamatorily linked Nuremberg 2.0 to alleged financial abuses in the German organisation Corona Ausschuss. We have to react, because someone might think that something is up. That is why the Polish Veto Foundation - the legal operator of the Nuremberg 2.0 project - has sent both online media a call to stop violating our personal rights.

We have no doubt that the outcome of legal intervention can only be positive, but a general observation beyond these cases also arises. The arguments we gather in our work against the creators of oppressive sanitisation are overwhelmingly scientific, and at the highest level of research standards - not infrequently they are further reinforced by the seriousness of the court. This is what happened in the case of Judge Mark Pittman of Texas, who ordered Pfizer to publish the research records of its preparations (we write about this, by the way, in the 3rd edition of the Nuremberg Notebooks).

It is worth recalling that science and evidence are based solely on logic and not on the individual characteristics of the proving party.      

Piotr Heszen